UCLA, ARB, WVU measure on-road particle numbers for heavy-duty diesel and CNG trucks in California

UCLA, ARB, WVU measure on-road particle numbers for heavy-duty diesel and CNG trucks in California

3 June 2017

In a new study, a team from UCLA, with colleagues from the California Air Resources Board (ARB) and West Virginia University, measured total particle number emission factors (PNEFs) from six newly certified heavy-duty vehicles (HDVs) powered by diesel and CNG totaling over 6,800 miles of on-road operation in California. They calculated distance-, fuel- and work-based PNEFs for each vehicle. A paper describing their findings is published in the ACS journal Environmental Science & Technology.

They found that distance-based PNEFs of the vehicles equipped with original equipment manufacturer (OEM) diesel particulate filters (DPFs) in the study had decreased by 355–3,200 times compared to a previous retrofit DPF dynamometer study. Fuel-based PNEFs were consistent with previous studies measuring plume exhaust in the ambient air. On-road PNEFs showed route and technology dependence.

Scientists and regulators have long known that PM is a mixture of different-sized particles. Within the PM category, ultrafine particles (UFPs) make up the smallest size fraction (d ≤ 100 nm). In the United States, PM is regulated on a mass basis as part of engine, vehicle, and ambient air quality standards. A small fraction of PM is attributed to UFPs, but when quantified on a number basis, UFPs may account for more than 90% of the total number of engine PM. Both animal and human studies have provided evidence for respiratory and cardiovascular effects associated with exposure to UFPs. Currently, there are no regulatory standards that directly control UFPs in the United States. U.S. EPA concluded that more research is needed to further investigate the role of UFPs on PM-mortality associations in its 2009 Integrated Science Assessment. In recognition that UFPs may be associated with potential health impacts, U.S. EPA has encouraged conducting UFP measurements at near-road monitoring sites.

Laboratory dynamometer emission tests have evaluated the total particle number emissions (PN) from HDVs with and without aftertreatment devices. Previous on-road tests have measured the concentration of solid particles, which are defined as particles that remain in the aerosol phase after thermal treatment at around 300 ˚C with diameters between 23 nm to 2.5 μm, using the Particle Measurement Programme (PMP) method. However, limited studies have examined total particle number emissions from HDVs driving on road, which are typically formed during dilution rather than combustion. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to help improve the understanding of real-world total particle number emission patterns of various HDV technologies, which will also help to better understand the impacts of HDV on near-roadway UFP concentrations.

—Wang et al.

The team selected the vehicles in the study to represent four emission technology groups currently prevalent in California:

  1. One MY 2007 (Vehicle Nº 1) diesel engine with no SCR and certified to a 2.3 g/bhp-hr NOx family emission limit (FEL);

  2. Two MY 2013 (Nº 2 and Nº 5) and a MY 2014 (Nº 4) diesel engines equipped with SCR;

  3. One MY 2013 compressed natural gas (CNG) (Nº 3) 12-L engine with a three-way catalyst (TWC) certified to the 0.2 g/bhp-hr NOx standard; and

  4. One hybrid diesel vehicle (Nº 6) with a MY 2011 engine with no SCR
    and certified to a 0.47 g/bhp-hr NOx FEL.

All diesel vehicles were equipped with a DOC and a DPF.

Six route types represented real-world driving conditions associated with freight operation in California, including steep hill climb; highway speed; congestion; stop-and-go operations at ports and rail yards; and urban “last-mile” delivery routes.

Wang
Route-specific PNEFs (in log scale) of the six vehicles compared to a reference study of MY 1998 diesel vehicles in the transient and cruise at 50 mph on the dyno. Credit: ACS, Wang et al. Click to enlarge.

All test vehicles pulled the West Virginia University’s Transportation Emissions Measurement System (TEMS), which was affixed to a flatbed trailer along with an on-board power generator. The TEMS housed a full-scale constant volume sampling (CVS) and a suite of gaseous and particle emission measurement systems. Two dilution systems were used for measuring total particle number concentrations in this study.

Wang2
Sampling configuration. Credit: ACS, Wang et al. SI. Click to enlarge.

Broadly, they found that for vehicles with OEM DPFs and Selective Catalytic Reduction Systems, PNEFs under highway driving (i.e., 3.34 × 1012 to 2.29 × 1013 particles/mile) were larger than those measured on urban and drayage routes (i.e., 5.06 × 1011 to 1.31 × 1013 particles/mile).

They suggested that this likely occurs because a significant amount of nucleation mode volatile particles were formed when the DPF outlet temperature reached a critical value—usually over 310 °C, which was commonly achieved when vehicle speed was sustained over 45 mph. A model year 2013 diesel HDV produced approximately 10 times higher PNEFs during DPF active regeneration events than non-active regeneration.

Resources

  • Tianyang Wang, David C. Quiros, Arvind Thiruvengadam, Saroj Pradhan, Shaohua Hu, Tao Huai, Eon S. Lee, and Yifang Zhu (2017) “Total Particle Number Emissions from Modern Diesel, Natural Gas, and Hybrid Heavy-Duty Vehicles During On-Road Operation”
    Environmental Science & Technology doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06464

http://ift.tt/2qMmVoM

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s